-What quotes did you underline or highlight?
1. “They prefer informal dialogue to classroom-style presentations, and they would rather have a speaker come to meet them.”
I highlighted this because I found this to be very true.
2. “One of the most surprising things I encountered after becoming executive director of WFAN was that even our organizational allies in sustainable agriculture don’t always understand why women need their own network within the movement.”
I thought this was very significant because it gave the reader insight on what she was writing about and why she feels as strongly as she does.
3.”Women own or co-own 47 percent of the farmland in Iowa, and the number of women farmland owners is rising nationally.”
The random fact thrown into the profile made her story seem even more important and showed how much passion she has for this debate.
-What stood out to you about this women's story?
I liked how in the very beginning she had many rhetorical questions through out the first paragraph that opened her article. She also does not talk in first person too often. She mostly talks as if she is part of a group…which she is. Instead of saying I am a farmer, landowners, researchers, etc. she says, “We are farmers, landowners, researchers, students and advocates. I also really think it’s interesting how instead of writing everything in a paragraph view she decided to list bullets that easily describe the differences between women and men that involves agriculture. To me the bullets grabbed the most attention from me and actually made me want to read what she had to say.
-What was your personal response to this profile?
My personal response to this profile is that I really liked how it was written. It wasn’t very formally written and it was entertaining to learn about. I think it is very good idea that women should be pushing for their concerns about food safety. I think the bullets in this section showed her argument the most on how men and women attitudes differ.